data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1931/b1931a1e230029c6a093d7ec7350f569eacfd0b0" alt="Halloween Hangman created by The Dimension's Edge, Inc."
Link sent by The Grandad.
What the Mama says.
In August 2005, before a historic summit aimed at eradicating dire poverty, a diminutive, mop-haired figure strode into the corridors of UN headquarters in New York and dropped a bombshell that blasted apart a year of diplomatic bridge-building.
John Bolton, Washington's newly appointed ambassador to the United Nations, had arrived on the scene, carrying a list of 750 amendments to the painstakingly negotiated summit document and changing its focus from poverty to administrative reform.
With less than a month to go until world leaders gathered for a widely anticipated endorsement of the paper, it was the diplomatic equivalent of "shock and awe."
"Bolton's views were well known, and there were expectations that he'd push hard on UN reform," says veteran Canadian diplomat Louise Fréchette, former deputy secretary general of the world body.
"But when he made such a huge case of it, people were taken by surprise."
Bolton's insistence on pushing Washington's reform agenda ahead of helping millions of poor people outraged developing countries, which had seen the summit as a boost for the UN Millennium Development Goals for wiping out the most extreme poverty by 2015. Some charged that the United States had "hijacked" the summit.
"We have looked everywhere," said Nicole Adimey, a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "The weird thing is, it's not acting like a normal manatee in the wild."
I guess a normal manatee would have waited.
We also understood that some might conclude there is a public relations benefit for the insurgents if we aired the material, especially on CNN International.
Just some might conclude airing the tape is beneficial to the insurgents? And would any of the some be, like, the insurgents who submitted the tape?
We also understood that this kind of footage is upsetting and disturbing for many viewers.
Gee, I wonder why... Is it because many of your viewers are fragile, easily disturbed wusses who just don't know what's good for them, or could it be that airing that video was in really bad taste?
But after getting beyond the emotional debate, we concluded the tape meets our criteria for newsworthiness.
Well, sure. How else are people supposed to know that soldiers get shot at by the enemy?