Showing posts with label Political Correctness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political Correctness. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

RIP Australian Multiculturalism

Australian leader John Howard has changed the name of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

Multiculturalism was first adopted by Canada's government in 1971 to address the clash of French and English cultures.

But it was rapidly adopted around the world, including Australia where it replaced "assimilation" as the best way to accommodate the influx of migrants.

And it has worked so well for Canada.

One can only hope others will follow Mr. Howard's lead.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

'Cuz Nice People Say F@6, Right?

Sheesh. Isaiah Washington stands accused of something -- homophobia? -- and something even worse -- using a mean word ending in -got. This is the third Using of Bad Words by a Celebrity lately, after Mel Gibson's direction of anti-Semitic slurs to the Jewish police officer who was arresting him and that guy from Seinfeld using anti-African American slurs to the African Americans who were teasing him while he was onstage. Why is this news? People who get in fights often say the meanest things they can think of with the express intent of deeply hurting the feelings of the person with whom they are fighting. I'm not defending the language, and I'm certainly not defending the sentiments embodied in the language, but I don't think it's fair to draw broad conclusions about people because of the things they say to a specific individual when they are angry. If Mel actually starts doing hateful things to Jews then we'll know he's an anti-semite; otherwise, he's just a drunken idiot who unimaginatively reached for the crudest possible tools in the midst of an argument. Same with the others. Breathlessly reporting their name calling only makes it seem worse than it is, and encourages those who are at risk of being called something really insulting (and who isn't?) that they've all suffered at the hands of Mel and Co. Is it really good for us to be that fragile?

Only to Be Expected

Muslim groups are protesting the portrayal of Muslim terrorists on 24.

"The overwhelming impression you get is fear and hatred for Muslims," said Rabiah Ahmed, a spokeswoman for the Washington-based Council on American Islamic Relations. She said Thursday she was distressed by this season's premiere.

"After watching that show, I was afraid to go to the grocery store because I wasn't sure the person next to me would be able to differentiate between fiction and reality."

Yeah. Fox is being irresponsible in portraying Muslims as terrorists because, like, that never happens in real life, but this woman who's afraid to go to the grocery store, she's not over-reacting. She's totally rational, and we should give a lot of weight to her concerns, and maybe alter a cultural phenomenon because of them.

Meanwhile, approximately zero government agents have protested Jack Bauer's latest escape tactic, despite the fact that so few of them have ever ripped any one's throat out with their teeth. But they will. You know they will. They just need to get organized.

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

US Airways Acted Correctly

Probes Dismiss Imam's Claims.
Three parallel investigations into the removal of six imams from a US Airways flight last month have so far concluded that the airline acted properly, that the imams' claims they were merely praying and their eviction was racially inspired are without foundation.
We can only hope the imam's and their like-minded friends will continue their noble boycott of US Airways. Perhaps they should consider expanding it to other airlines.

Political Correctness Hampering Iraqi Army?

This article about an Iraqi army sergeant is very revealing, both as to the difficulties they encounter with sectarian politics, and the use of the media to pressure the Iraqi army by the different sects.

“We need to give the Americans back all the authority over the Iraqi Army like before.”

Concerns abound that Iraq’s Defence Ministry is being manipulated to serve the interests of powerful Sunni and Shia political parties. A decision by the US military to hand over full control of Iraq’s Army to a Government plagued by sectarian interests, could well spell its ruin.

The sergeant, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears that his criticism of the Government’s handling of the military could get him fired or killed, is one of several officers who complained to The Times of government threats against army units that have led raids against Sunni and Shia armed groups.

Senior US military officers have also expressed concern over campaigns to remove defence officials and commanders considered to be tough on government-linked militias.

The sergeant, dressed in a US Army shirt, bemoaned the intensifying government pressure. He feels that the Americans have taught his men to be a professional, non-sectarian force and political parties are undermining them.

“If we detain Sunni terrorists, many of the Sunnis working for the Government will keep pushing us and our battalion commanders and ask us why you do that. Sometimes they will make a complaint against us. If we do the same thing in Sadr City, they (Shia officials) will make an announcement on television that we are doing the wrong thing and killing innocent people.”

He recalled two instances where high-profile raids against a suspected armed group led to requests from within the Defence Ministry to transfer a key officer. The sergeant was afraid things would only get worse as the Iraqi Government takes more power.



He thinks that putting the army back under American control would alleviate the problem. I wish I could be as sure.

Also of note, he plans to leave Iraq if the US withdraws.
Yet in his years with the Iraqi Army he has learnt one simple lesson: once the US military pulls back in Iraq, he should leave the country if he wants to survive. “As soon as it happens, I will quit my job and live outside Iraq,” the sergeant told The Times.

...A colleague concurred, shaking his head at the partisan situation. “Each party is fighting to make his party first in a ministry. All people are just fighting for their own interests. If the coalition forces withdraw, all the people really working closely with the coalition forces, will leave because we will all be targets.” Between them, the two soldiers have had 50 colleagues killed in the past three years and another 10 troops kidnapped by the al-Mahdi Army.


I've noticed that the biggest problem for the third world seems to be the lack of honorable men willing to serve for the good of their societies. It's understandable why they would want to leave when they find themselves severely out-numbered and in fear for their lives, and that is why it's so important that we not abandon them, even if it means staying for a very long time. How else can we expect anyone to take on the sort of risk it entails to reform a corrupt, failing society in a decent manner if we bail on these guys.

One thing the world is not short of is corrupt, failing societies.

It's not just honorable people we'd be abandoning, it's honor itself.